You are using an old web browser. Such browsers do not support modern web technologies and do not offer proper security. Please update your browser or download one of the others suggested for free.
Mozilla Firefox |
Google Chrome |
Internet Explorer |
The Dunkel Index - A pile of crap, or great fade material?
I have never given any attention to the Dunkel Index, though I saw that in almost all sports forums people post it religiously every day.
Recently I was thinking to do some research on it, but in forums there is not much info about the actual Dunkel records, only that there are around 51% in all sports.
Some posters said it's worthless to follow exactly, but it's a very good tool in handicapping.
This morning I went to work, and I compiled all the results in the MLB season thus far and compared them with the Dunkel picks (need to say, I double checked everything, so there are no errors, or if there are, they should be minimal).
Here is what I found:
Money line picks:
104 Won, 101 Lost, this is 50.73% hit ratio - of course bad, one could not broke even if followed every ML pick
but the shocker came at
85 Won, 109 Lost, this is 43.81% hit ratio - horrible
I'm thinking that Totals can be great fade material, and ML pick should be ignored!
What do you think, results are so bad just because we are early in the MLB season, and at the basis of these picks are the pre-season games?
Anyone has done any research on Dunkel, there are differences in records between sports?
I know originally Dunkel was developed for basketball, this would mean that in hoops there records are a bit better?
Of course on the site they never talk about records, but there is a phrase at the beginning:
"Created in 1929 by Dick Dunkel, Sr., as the original power rating system, the Dunkel Index has consistently produced top-quality ratings and picks for sports fans everywhere"
I consider this to be big BS....
Top quality rankings maybe but top quality picks?
And another question:
I really wonder how some can say Dunkel is very helpful in handicapping?.
A wise man at this forum once told me @ 10 years ago " you can't have too much information - read all you can and then make your own educated decision" (Obviously he has more time on his hands than I do) but what I do believe he was saying was look at the so called experts posts or predictions but make your own choices because no one is always right all the time. that being said I do look at the Dunkle as a guide source during football - I consider it a plus of it happens to agree with my way if thinking. However I've never placed a bet strictly because of a Dunkle Report and I am not sure I've ever looked at it for other sports except in C-Notes threads (which again I use a for daily info source - along with a lot of the info sources and posts on this site)
I know this doesn't help answer your questiin very much but don't think anyone here will tell you any source is a given - some are just hotter than others at certain times !
I totally agree. I think some refer to the Dunkel index as being more of an automatic source in making picks determinations when to me it's only about as an effective method as flipping a coin. I'm not too much of a system or trend capper but I'd sooner refer and depend on my own knowledge before turning to an index that hasn't proven itself in the long haul.
For the latest sports news, capper picks and tracker results, turn to JTG, the leader in BTB information
Like most systems, trends, etc, it's more of a selling tool for touts than anything else. At the end of the day, my son could pick 10 different games and have just a good a shot as going 6-4 or 7-3 vs. most anybody. Lines are there for a reason, to even the playing field and make Vegas money.
I must be gettin' old... I still think baseball is cool.